"Notice" has become an issue with the amusing McCuskers
It may be Jimmy-Buffet-warm here, but this is still a third-world country. As such the mail system is very slow and actually unreliable.....mail from the Americas takes at least 4 weeks (and usually 6 to 8), so it stands to reason that any correspondence between the McCuskers and me would have to be done by a more reliable method. This is particularly true of notices that must be made in a timely fashion, such as for the Court. Occasionally mail here is actually stolen. Email or phone, anyone?
Over the last 9 years I've collected 32 different "notices" from the McCuskers as to how to correspond with them. A few of these notices over the years were emails signed "Steve" but that were clearly from Liz-------how do I know that? Because when I called him on it, that's what Steve told me. He told me on several occasions that emails to me telling me to only correspond with him via Liz had actually come from Liz. Emails putatively from Steve that had come in the middle of the night, had actually already given me a clue on that. I've seen middle-of-the-night posts from Liz on her Facebook account, but I've never known Steve to be a big night-owl. Not even in college.
It was always, "only contact me by email", or "only contact me by phone", or "contact Steve only via Liz", or "Don't ever contact Liz", or "contact me by email but only between these hours", or "Don't contact me at work", or "only contact me at work".....you get the picture.
In spite of this weirdness, I've always done as asked (switching around 32 times). But in January 2017 I had to give notice to THEM-----which is my right to do under the Defamation Judgment and Promissory Note-----that I could only be reached via email or phone for a few months.
So why did the McCuskers then send me a mailed letter in mid-January (that I still have not received)? I feel they did it because they do things their way (that sense of entitlement again) regardless of the facts or my rights under the law.
In my opinion it's not unlike what got them into trouble in the first place------Steve owed me a mere $23,500, which I was willing to forgive. But instead, with Liz's sage advice, he escalated the situation by lying about "harassment", which he later told me he did only to keep the peace at home.
And now he'd rather escalate the situation again. Sheesh.
Over the last 9 years I've collected 32 different "notices" from the McCuskers as to how to correspond with them. A few of these notices over the years were emails signed "Steve" but that were clearly from Liz-------how do I know that? Because when I called him on it, that's what Steve told me. He told me on several occasions that emails to me telling me to only correspond with him via Liz had actually come from Liz. Emails putatively from Steve that had come in the middle of the night, had actually already given me a clue on that. I've seen middle-of-the-night posts from Liz on her Facebook account, but I've never known Steve to be a big night-owl. Not even in college.
It was always, "only contact me by email", or "only contact me by phone", or "contact Steve only via Liz", or "Don't ever contact Liz", or "contact me by email but only between these hours", or "Don't contact me at work", or "only contact me at work".....you get the picture.
In spite of this weirdness, I've always done as asked (switching around 32 times). But in January 2017 I had to give notice to THEM-----which is my right to do under the Defamation Judgment and Promissory Note-----that I could only be reached via email or phone for a few months.
So why did the McCuskers then send me a mailed letter in mid-January (that I still have not received)? I feel they did it because they do things their way (that sense of entitlement again) regardless of the facts or my rights under the law.
In my opinion it's not unlike what got them into trouble in the first place------Steve owed me a mere $23,500, which I was willing to forgive. But instead, with Liz's sage advice, he escalated the situation by lying about "harassment", which he later told me he did only to keep the peace at home.
And now he'd rather escalate the situation again. Sheesh.